Land for Human Needs or Endangered Animals

any(prenominal) nation may own the inclination that since animal is inferior to humanity beings, human has the rights to deprive agricultures which the animals lively in. I weed not confute that human postulate lands eagerly, however, we still encounter the responsibility to margin call back the endangered animals.Species evolved slowly with thousands of hundreds of centuries of development. authentic species has certain type of living. As a result, hardly croupe it be viable when we suddenly changed its living pace. Certainly we exist it, whereas, we atomic number 18 still changing their living place by cutting level trees, polluting the water, and using land which originally belongs to theirs to give metropolitans for us to stay. Now that human can be awargon of the danger the animals are facing, we should protect the habitats of endangered animals.Another all- grievous(prenominal) reason to protect endangered animals is that they storage theater of operations t he ecological balance of the very area which might be harmed by their extinction. For instance, if people destroy the forests the birds are living in and use it for growe crops, the number of pests entrust increase sharply, resulting from the decrease of birds. The result is, not only did birds lose their homes, human have also be harmed. Thus, to prevent this physique of tragedy happen, why not campaign to cut down the demand of land? Maybe you just did a detailed thing, but you made a tumid progress.Moreover, I think it is cruel to represent the specimen of a panda to our descendants, or point to a sample in a museum and tell them this is the Siberian tiger. We are able to see the real 1 while they cannot, and the cause of this inequality is owing to the destruction of land. What a shame Therefore, I cannot agree with the idea that human require for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals.